Hi Time

VISION  1.1.'80 _  2020



i.e. [(e = mc^2) = (e= 5mc^2)]

(2) Einstein's Confidence Trick; (3) Hubble Constant nonsense, visible in detecting 'one- inch per 14-million-mile' galaxies speed increase, and even more especially when Einstein's e=mc^2 is applied; (4) The Experts' cone-shaped universe with no 'back-drop'  because of INERTIA after The Big Bang's kick-up-the-backside,  thus no bodies to be seen looking backward only sideways (?); and (5) Universe written anew by virtue of the brand-new Universal Constant, are all presented below, and in a presentation that is definitely not rocket science.

If its content is judged to be worth a £10 read by 65 million concerned persons world-wide a new industry will be founded, the profits of which will fund the build of 10 fully-manoeuvrable spacecraft able to position automatic-self-positioning sun-shields to cool oceans and stabilise to eventually save our planet; and mine Solar System - mining profits to fund 'travel-hubs' at major cities utilising  an unique energy source having a saleable surplus  and putting the cheapest national, international, orbital and off-planet travel on everyones doorstep, and with which fuel-burning travel will be unable to compete and thus die-out.

The product of over 30-years efforts, the drive-unit will take manned craft complete with 40% Earth-'gravity' anywhere in Solar System in 4-days, with mining drones able to travel faster - knowing what 'gravity' is not, is the key. 



To advance quality of life for all on our planet by maximising wealth-creation potential of a new physical principle by world-wide mass-manufacture/sales of its most desirable product - no energy-input needed - so profits enable build of fully-manoeuvrable spacecraft to realised design; and to be used to stabilise our planet by using programmeable self-positioning sun-shields to cool oceans, hurricanes, cool the 'hot-lids' off tornados to halt them; re-freeze ice-caps; eject nuclear-waste into the Sun; and boost resources by mining our solar-system.


New-product industry to be funded by concerned persons world-wide who are challenged to do their bit and by 65 million paying £10 only : eventual £30-billion IPO for Hi Time (ET) Ltd, needed for £40/50 billion for ten craft - £1>2 billion for craft itself; £1 billion each for one-sFNR for craft,  one-modular-small-nuclear-reactor for £1>2billion surface lifepod, to mine Solar-system; plus sun-shields' costs.

  [4th generation small-nuclear-reactors are still mainly on the drawing-board being reduced from container- to car-size, and with developmental costs yet to be met. Financially-backed intent to initially buy 20 and with more needed in the not-too-distant future to be funded by off-planet mining returns, would accelerate development to ensure availability in three-years time]

With Hi Time earning just £10billion pa during 20-year international production monopoly awarded by IPC patent, simultaneous build of ten craft will take at least 3-years and time presses..

...JUNE 2019 


- climate scientists have warned a 2°c increase in Indian Ocean temperature will see Monsoon rains attracted away from Asian rice-growing areas promising dire consequences for the world


      Month 10 of 12-month project will see production earn £1.6 billion, with IPO launch after month 12 ‐ information ONLY on this site. 

      PAY £10 ONLY TO 


(Keep Paypal transaction ID to buy-into IPO for perpetual income)





Einstein's 'thought experiment' presenting the 'equivalence of gravity and acceleration', that they are 'one and the same', has seduced the World's scientific community out of its critical faculties for over a century.

If I was the person floating at the centre of Einstein's box floating in the vacuum of space, and suddenly found my feet touching the box-'floor', I would know with certainty, as should everyone, that the box had been pulled upward (acceleration)  

And I would know, also with certainty, as should everyone , that my feet touching the floor could not have been caused by attraction toward a larger body (gravity)

I would not be "uncertain" as Einstein cunningly suggests.

I would be certain the box had been pulled upward thanks to Galileo Galilei's circa-1600ce experiment  revealing that 'all bodies fall at the same speed'. 

And a proven fact which makes impossible my feet touching the box-floor being due to gravity.

And because box and person will fall toward larger, attracting body at the same rate of travel and with box making contact with larger body before feet make contact with box, which will have already made contact with larger body.

So no equivalent event of feet touching box-floor due to both acceleration and gravity : only accelerating box makes feet touch floor.

Thus there is no equivalence of gravity and acceleration as Einstein would have us believe, and to establish the building-block of his General Theory of Relativity.

Einstein's cunning 'sleight-of-mind' substitution of Aristotle's 'heavier bodies fall faster' (person must be heavier than box in Einstein's mind) for that which displaced it after 1,800-years of unquestioning acceptance, namely, Galileo's 'all bodies fall at an equal speed' certainly questions the basis of Einstein's "happiest thought".

Either Einstein is conducting a confidence-trick, and one wittingly intended to avoid earning the disdain entailed in having to beg the scientific community to please make 'a leap-of-faith' into acceptance of his 'spacetime-continuum', and thus its 'distortion by curvature-of-bodies' and which explains gravity - both of which linked notions are fundamental building blocks upon which Einstein's General Theory of Relativity is built; OR Einstein believed Aristotle's 'heavier bodies fall faster', rather than Galileo's 'bodies fall at an equal speed', and which the World's scientific community accepts as a fundamental truth of physical science?   

No 'equivalence of gravity and acceleration', means no 'distortion' of  'spacetime-continuum' causing gravity. 

Indeed, a 'spacetime-continuum' has no cause or reason to exist.

Thus there is no reason, no cause whatsoever for Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. 

The Theory is wittingly built on the entirely false premise of Einstein's Long-Con, that acceleration and gravity are one and the same, but has been shown above to not be so.

2/3 reveals an attempt to protect Einstein's spacetime-continuum  (what spacetime-continuum?)  from providing the grounds via Hubble, for the exceeding of the speed-of-light-constant 'c', by checking-out the integrity of e = mc^2.

But with the 'squaring-of-'c' Einstein invents another 'equivalence' which does not work, on neither the atomic scale, nor the galactic scale .

Only a small percentage of an atom's mass remains missing, as seen in 'the atom defect.

But it is 95% of the universe 'believed missing, believed invisible, believed undetectable' : 4-pounds-weight must be added to every pound-weight in the universe to make e=mc^2 work.

It is Einstein's equation e=mc^2 which is regarded therefore as being unfit-for-purpose, and it is not only the atom, but also the universe being forced to comply with the equation which creates the Experts' crackpot universe, and also the prevention of scientific advance which might have previously led to, for example,  the discovery of a 6-dof spacecraft propulsion unit and to have made rocket-science redundant by now.

The most famous of equations, e=mc^2, is very much the name of 'the tailor' of 'A New Emperor's New Clothes'   

If there is indeed no substance to the existence of gravity then there can be no 'gravitational wave' and LIGO may have had  its interferometry disturbed by, for  example, a hit from the new particle which suddenly appeared out of nowhere to seriously question the particle-set of The Theory of Everything - not a lot is yet known about this particular particle.

It would be a great international shame indeed if Professor Stephen Hawking was seen to have maybe thrown in the towel on life because his major life-work on Black Holes was rubbished as a consequence of a one-hundred-year-old+ confidence trick.





SHIFTY-REDS BLUES (one-inch-per-second speed-up every 14-million-miles!?) 


Hubble's  invitation to Einstein to visit his observatory was, in essence, an opportunity for Hubble to show off his new-fangled space-entities called 'galaxies'; their flying away from each other; and at an increasing speed.   

Following his visit Einstein fervently sought a 'variant-'c'.

And a variant-'c'  he was unable to come-up with and which became a pursuit he gave-up on several times .

And so there was no catering for the proposition Einstein must have realised runaway-galaxies presented : the supposedly impossible exceeding of the speed-of-light, 'c', 186,262-miles-per-second in the spacetime-continuum,  and  now a real possibility, because of Hubble's runaway galaxies.  

And this was going to happen in Einstein's very own 'spacetime-continuum' to cast serious doubt on a fundamental building-block of his General Theory of Relativity to thus bring the whole Theory into question.

But without the 'variant 'c'' it is only the integrity  of Einstein's e = mc^2 which can be looked-to  to provide a counter to the possibility, of an exceeding of 'c' in his spacetime-continuum, it seems.

To explain :  two galaxies flying away from each other needs only one of the two travelling at 50%- 'c', to reach 50.0001% of 'c' for Einstein's spacetime-continuum to be entertaining a contradiction of a fundamental building-block of his General Theory of Relativity, the impossibility of exceeding  'c'. 

In this case neither of the two galaxies speeding away from each other actually reaches  the 'critical-mass' which automatically causes self-annihillation when arriving at 'c', as the speed is not actual, but only 'relative'.  

Even so, being 'relative' is the fundamental basis of Einstein's theory, so if one curvature distorts the 'spacetime-continuum' to cause gravity, curvatures of both  galaxies would seem to suggest some reaction or other must take place at 'relative' 'c', and the almighty bang of two galaxies self-annihilating would seem to  be the appropriate reaction.

Even if Einstein is given the benefit of the doubt and actual 'critical-mass' has to be reached before self-annihilation occurs and as his squaring of 'c' would seem to convey, both opposed galaxies will carry-on increasing in speed until 'c' is actually reached anyway, and with self-anihilation assured in accord with Einstein's fundamental belief regarding 'c'.   

In Einstein's thinking an exceeding of 'c' is prevented by a body's attainment of 'critical-mass' - that which is aimed for to make an atomic bomb go bang - an explosive release of energy contained by body's mass. 

The very internal energy, that is, which reacts against/with the spacetime-continuum to cause bodies to be spat around the universe like pips from a squeezed grape, as Einstein would have us believe.

If the speed of 'c' is indeed to be reached by opposite-runaway galaxies, what will their self-annihilation mean to a spacetime-continuum?   

Can an annihilation of the spacetime-continuum itself occur by galaxies continuing to self-annihilate?

Or can it  be ruled out? 

And as it must be if Einstein's General Theory of Relativity is to hold together and survive.

So how does the only  'variant-'c' Einstein seems ever to have proposed, the  'squaring-of-'c', manage to protect his spacetime-continuum from annihilation by self-annihilating galaxies?

In relying only on the squaring-of-'c' Einstein seems to have lost faith with the purely 'relative' by visibly relying on the 'squaring', choosing that galaxies must reach actual physical critical-mass by actually reaching 'c', before they go bang.

The combined speed of two oppositely travelling galaxies reaching 'c' in the spacetime-continuum means the exceeding of 186,262 mps up to 34,653,532,644 miles-per-second combined speed. 

And after both had, at some mystical point or other, suddenly taken-off to rush away from each other in the spacetime-continuum at an increasing rate-of-knots.

And for no readily apparent reason or knowable cause.

So Einstein must have ruled-out the possibility of any two galaxies travelling away from each other self-annihilating at exactly the same moment in time, and especially given such an incredible speed, to prevent threat to his spacetime- continuum.

And no matter how infinitesimely small the time difference, this he must have taken as serving to protect the spacetime-continuum by giving it recovery time, and to thus prevent two great chunks of spacetime-continuum being removed at exactly the same time by two self-annihilating galaxies to thus threaten his spacetime-continuum's survival by it suffering annihilation by disconnect.

Either this, or 'c'-squared is nothing but 'a big number' which, like Grandma's shawl, can 'cover' to avoid any and every awkward eventuality.

But whether at reaching 50%-of-'c', as Einstein's emphasis on 'relativity' suggests, or at 100%-of-'c' as his 'squaring' suggests, and in this fudge regarding the only means to protect his spacetime-continuum, Hubble's runaway galaxies will eventually be reaching critical-mass and causing visible fireworks-displays by self-annihilating in the heavens anyway.

According to Einstein, that is.

And to provide an amazing and continuous firework-displays as billions of galaxies continue to rush away from each other.

And backed by the (shown to be totally questionable) validity of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, of course.

Whole galaxies self-annihilating mere moments apart, a sight to behold indeed, and on a continuing basis as billions of galaxies continue to fly-apart at an ever-increasing speed

According to Hubble, that is..  

Where in heavens might this sight be enjoyed? 

How to find-out?  

Do what cosmologists do, and use Hubble's Constant.

Hubble asserts an incremental increase in the speed of galaxy-separation of 44-miles-per-second for every 2-mega-parsecs of distance from a fixed Earth-bound observer, or one-inch-per-second-every-14-million-miles.

A mega-parsec is 1-million parsecs, with a parsec equal to 3.26-light-years : 2-Mpc = 6.5-million-light-years.

44-mps divided into 'c' 186,262-mps, gives the amount of increments of 2-Mps needed to be reached to be 4,233 for a galaxy to attain 'c', and thus reach critical-mass in order to go bang.

6.5-million-light-years multiplied by 4,233  equals 23,456,250-bly.

23.5-billion-light-years distance from an Earth-bound observer must be reached by  Hubble's runaway galaxies before going bang.

23.5-bly in space-travel takes 23.5-billion-years in time.

The first thought is that in a universe presently 13.82-billion-years-old means a rather long wait of 9.6-billion-years before fireworks become a permanent feature of the universe - not knowing the age of the universe at the time when galaxies chose to become runaways  makes it difficult to assess when fireworks should begin, or is it  'when they began' past-tense. 

But inertial-travel dictates the universe to be 2 x 13.82 = 27.64 billion-miles across, or sideways, and, also, such thoughts are not valid in all universes.

The Experts' 'cone-shaped' universe, for example, has a 'visible-distance' within of 92-billion-light-years - an 'ice-cream-cone' , so to speak, entertaining '7-times-too-much ice-cream', given the 13.82 billion-year age - so galaxies of a billion-or more stars exploding two-at-a-time should be visible at 23.5bly)

An internet-search returned  for 'Lambda - CDM, The Experts' 'Standard Model' of the cosmos, will carry a sketch of this cone.

'Lambda - Cold Dark Matter Constant' is The Experts version of our universe, the 'Standard Model' of our cosmos, and agreed to  in the mid-1980s.

Lambda-CDM is based on Einstein's 'relativity' equation being seemingly combined with Hubble's notions, but with both visibly being kept entirely separate by means of the Greek-letter Einstein chose for  pursuit of a variant 'c', Lambda, an upside-down upper-case V.

And this letter is used to carry-forward Hubble's input into the universe as a 'unity'. 

Thus it is that which can in no way be worked-in to affect Einstein's equation : by, for example, considerations related to Lambda - CDM's '95% believed missing, believed invisible, believed undetectable' universe - as has been done above to arrive at a cosmic fireworks-display, to thus reveal the possible oddity of outcomes when attempting to combine Einstein with Hubble.

The cone-shape having the  universe's galaxies forming a ring around the top and from which they can be seen flying outward in any sketch of the Lambda-CDM 

The failure of Einstein's 'e' of e=mc^2 to account for the mass and acceleration of bodies, at the edge of galaxies for example, forces a nonsensical  [(e = mc^2)  =  (e = 5mc^2)] onto the whole of the universe,  4kgs  of mass needing to be added to every kilogramme of mass in the universe, 4-kgs of missing, invisible, undetectable 'Dark Matter' that is, and which accounts for 23% of the 95% of missing universe.

The 'e' of e=mc^2 is also used to account for the energy needed to make the universe's galaxies fly away from each other at an increasing rate, and by the invention of a Dark Energy : the missing 72% of the 95% of the universe which, as with Dark Matter, Dark Energy is also believed missing, believed invisible and believed undetectable.

All to keep-up the appearance of e = mc^2 having a mathematically 'scientific' validity, and also to keep-up the appearance of the validity of Hubble's notions.

Hubble's 72% share in the non-sensical '95% missing, invisible, undetectable'  universe stems from his easy leap onto The Big Bang band-wagon offering 'natural universal divergence'.

The Big Bang may be likened to a hand-grenade exploding to send its shrapnel outward in an ever-increasing sphere of bits.

But in the vacuum of space the explosion sends the bits in every direction, at the same speed-of-travel, in a straight-line-unique-direction of travel, unalterably so, and forever.

This is the very definition of 'INERTIA' : the FORCE which drives the MASS of the universe after the  almighty kick-up the backside delivered by The Big Bang

But with galaxies having their Big Bang unalterable inertial drive altered to the rotational drive that we know, is surely demanding of explanation!

The Big Bang Theory had been around  long enough for Hubble to have realised that the unalterable divergence of the 'bits' of the universe is an incontravertible fact and an especially 'safe' proposition if claimed as a basis for a fame-giving Theory - Hubble was a self-aggrandiser who  thought nothing of awarding an existing honour to himself without the knowledge  of the awarding body.

The Experts were also aware that 'universal, natural divergence' existed, but as a problem that needed to be explained away, and by conceiving  of a realm less-complex than an expanding sphere (as with the exploding hand-grenade) for this would obviously result in a seemingly empty universe by now (to anyone on one of the diverged 'bit' that is) and so Experts came up with their cone-shaped universe, one more amenable to maths and thus dynamic physics, and to avoid the inertia leading to the 'empty universe' caused by 'bits diverging' from every other 'bit' for 13.82  billion-years, as no bit would be visible to any other.

The Experts claim is that The Big Bang's totality of powered-mass was  manhandled by the pre-existing Laws of Physics to be 'blunderbussed' into a uni-directional 'cone-shaped' universe.

Not manhandled willy-nilly into a uni-directional  universe, a one-way constant-speed route, but manhandled with some sophistication and a finesse made available by a bespoke-blunderbuss, one designed to blast just sufficient 'natural' amount of divergence to prevent the attraction of bits to one another to form a one-clump universe, and which would thus permit the universe we see all around us to come into being (or would it?)

According to The Experts, that is.

But The Experts create a major problem with their blunderbuss theory' .

For once The Laws of Physics have prevented attraction at source to avoid a one-clump universe, and to thus cause a  'natural divergence', it is somewhat disingenuous - an impossibility, really - to then claim 'natural attraction' as the force responsible for the creation of galaxies!

Given the unalterable direction and speed of  'all bits'  from the kick-up-the-backside delivered by The Big Bang, that is.

The explanation for how the transition is made by matter from unalterable inertia to dynamic rotation is basic and fundamental to understanding so as to be able to explain our universe, and this cannot be side-stepped or fudged.

Einstein did not even know the universe of galaxies existed when formulating his Theory of Relativityin his 1915 Berlin Lectures, based as it is solely on his knowledge of what goes on in our Solar System.

The Experts explanation for galactic rotation, name 'attraction'  is confounded at source. 

And also, and tellingly, there is not even a hint as to what might be continually powering the rotation of a galaxy, of all galaxies. 

And there is no wriggle-room left at all to cater for e = mc^2  being a dud of an equation.

Hubble does not bother to even stray into the realm of explanation!

He takes divergence as read and utilises a sound-effect caused by the Earth's atmosphere, the Doppler Effect, as a means for explaining a light-effect where no atmosphere exists.

The trouble with the Doppler Effect as sound-effect is that the observer must remain fixed to hear an ambulance-siren coming closer and then drop in tone as it travels past and goes further  away : in travelling further the waves of sound conveyed by atmosphere grow wider and thus lower the tone.

 But ambulance-chasing will not allow any difference at all in the siren's tone to be noticed, as there will be no difference, and because the observer travels along with the ambulance, thesiren's sound waves thus staying the same.

And similarly, just as an Earth-bound observer travels at the same 143mps speed as a galaxy the distance of which the observer is attempting to calculate, travelling galaxy with galaxy at the same speed of travel should eliminate any doppler difference, right?

In a word, no 'fixed observer' at all, then : ambulance-chasing having the same effect as galaxy chasing, no change.

(Hopefully, imminent eyes-surgery will speed-up  completion of 2/3 & 3/3) 




 ooE = M1<_x10*3 - >a-M  



MassOneIncreasing toward _ ten-to-the-power-of-three, 



(currently that is: Equation 3/4)



Based on near-1,000/1 relationship of the mass of any galaxy and its central Super-Massive Black Hole : given the widely differing distances between and across galaxies, and their vastly differing sizes, from a million-or-so to tens-of-billions of solar-masses, the only possible cause of  this indisputable constancy across the Universe necessarily being ENTANGLEMENT OF EACH AND EVERY ATOM IN THE UNIVERSE

[See U-tube BBC_Horizon_"Who's afraid of a big Black Hole? " _ go to_ 50 minutes_ Professor Romesh Narayan, Harvard_ on Black Holes: _go to_20 minutes _ Professor Michio Kaku fails Einstein's maths.]


Hi Time Ltd  

Ian T Hinchey

Selby  N. Yorkshire YO8 5AY